Home

Who We Are

 Alerts

Guidelines Ethics & Conduct Purpose
Anti-Gun Mentality Raging Against Self-Defense
PDF file 
Join Us MASSACHUSETTS TYRANNY RESPONSE TEAM MEMBER SITES UN Troops - What they have in store for you  PDF File  Gun Control Myths If They Build It 
Would You Go
Declaration of Noncompliance 911 Call  
PDF file 
Declaration Of Independence

Mass. TRT DSS News

New World Order List of Other
TRT Chapters
Give It To Them Straight Rule By Law MASS. TRT Members as Armed Guards Camp Gun Free Rapist UN Gun Plans 
PDF File 
News From the NYC TRT Rally News 2nd Amendment - Why It Is Important To Our Freedom Anti Self-Defense & Mass Extermination 13 Signposts to Tyranny & Slavery United States
Constitution
Registration
PDF File
Glossary of Words 
PDF File
Kennedy's 1961 Blueprint for Disarming Americans Bill Of Rights Freedom Site Links Massachusetts 
Constitution

PDF FILE

DISARMAMENT OF AMERICA


This is the 1961 BLUEPRINT for Disarming the populations of the world (including the U.S.) while militarily building up the U.N. as drawn up for the U.N. by President John F. Kennedy's State Dept. under Secretary of State Dean Rusk. Read it! We are now in "THE FINAL PHASE".

FREEDOM FROM WAR

 

THE UNITED STATES PROGRAM
FOR GENERAL AND COMPLETE
DISARMAMENT IN A PEACEFUL
WORLD


DEPARTMENT OF STATE


DEPARTMENT OF STATE PUBLICATION 7277
Disarmament Series 5
Released September 1961

Office of Public Services
BUREAU OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS


For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office
Washington 25, D.C. - Price 15 cents.

 

Introduction

   The revolutionary development of modern weapons within a world divided by serious ideological differences has produced a crisis in human history. In order to overcome the danger of nuclear war now confronting mankind, the United States has introduced at the Sixteenth General Assembly of the United Nations a Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World.
   This new program provides for the progressive reduction of the war-making capabilities of nations and the simultaneous strengthening of international institutions to settle disputes and maintain the peace. It sets forth a series of comprehensive measures which can and should he taken in order to bring about a world in which there will be freedom from war and security for all states. It is based on three principles deemed essential to the achievement of practical progress in the disarmament field:

First, there must be immediate disarmament action:

   A strenuous and uninterrupted effort must be made toward the goal of general and complete disarmament; at the same time, it is important that specific measures be put into effect as soon as possible.

Second, all disarmament obligations must be subject
to effective international controls:

   The control organization must have the manpower, facilities, and effectiveness to assure that limitations or reductions take place as agreed. It must also be able to certify to all states that retained forces and armaments do not exceed those permitted at any stage of the disarmament process.

Third, adequate peace-keeping machinery must be established:

   There is an inseparable relationship between the scaling down of national armaments on the one hand and the building up of international peace-keeping machinery and institutions on the other. Nations are unlikely to shed their means of self-protection in the absence of alternative ways to safeguard their legitimate interests. This can only be achieved through the progressive strengthening of international institutions under the United Nations and by creating a United Nations Peace Force to enforce the peace as the disarmament process proceeds.



   There follows a summary of the principal provisions of the United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World.The full text of the program is contained in an appendix to this pamphlet.

FREEDOM FROM WAR

THE UNITED STATES PROGRAM FOR
GENERAL AND COMPLETE DISARM-
AMENT IN A PEACEFUL WORLD

 


Summary

DISARMAMENT GOAL AND OBJECTIVES

   The over-all goal of the United States is a free, secure, and peaceful world of independent states adhering to common standards of justice and international conduct and subjecting the use of force to the rule of law; a world which has achieved general and complete disarmament under effective international control; and a world in which adjustment to change takes place in accordance with the principles of the United Nations.
   In order to make possible the achievement of that goal, the program sets forth the following specific objectives toward which nations should direct their efforts:

The disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of their reestablishment in any form whatsoever other than those required to preserve internal order and for contributions to a United Nations Peace Force;

The elimination from national arsenals of all armaments, including all weapons of mass destruction and the means for their delivery, other than those required for a United Nations Peace Force and for maintaining internal order;

The institution of effective means for the enforcement of international agreements, for the settlement of disputes, and for the maintenance of peace in accordance with the principles of the United Nations;

The establishment and effective operation of an International Disarmament Organization within the framework of the United Nations to insure compliance at all times with all disarmament obligations.


TASK OF NEGOTIATING STATES

   The negotiating states are called upon to develop the program into a detailed plan for general and complete disarmament and to continue their efforts without interruption until the whole program has been achieved. To this end, they are to seek the widest possible area of agreement at the earliest possible date. At the same time, and without prejudice to progress on the disarmament program, they are to seek agreement on those immediate measures that would contribute to the common security of nations and that could facilitate and form part of the total program.

GOVERNING PRINCIPLES

   The program sets forth a series of general principles to guide the negotiating states in their work. These make clear that:

As states relinquish their arms, the United Nations must be progressively strengthened in order to improve its capacity to assure international security and the peaceful settlement of disputes;

Disarmament must proceed as rapidly as possible, until it is completed, in stages containing balanced, phased, and safeguarded measures;

Each measure and stage should be carried out in an agreed period of time, with transition from one stage to the next to take place as soon as all measures in the preceding stage have been carried out and verified and as soon as necessary arrangements for verification of the next stage have been made;

Inspection and verification must establish both that nations carry out scheduled limitations or reductions and that they do not retain armed forces and armaments in excess of those permitted at any stage of the disarmament process; and

Disarmament must take place in a manner that will not affect adversely the security of any state.


DISARMAMENT STAGES

   The program provides for progressive disarmament steps to take place in three stages and for the simultaneous strengthening of international institutions.

 

FIRST STAGE


   The first stage contains measures which would significantly reduce the capabilities of nations to wage
aggressive war. Implementation of this stage would mean that:

 

The nuclear threat would be reduced:

   All states would have adhered to a treaty effectively prohibiting tile testing of nuclear weapons.
The production of fissionable materials for use in weapons would be stopped and quantities of such materials from past production would be converted to non-weapons uses.
   States owning nuclear weapons would not relinquish control of such weapons to any nation not owning them and would not transmit to any such nation information or material necessary for their manufacture.
   States not owning nuclear weapons would no~ manufacture them or attempt to obtain control of such weapons belonging to other states.
   A Commission of Experts would be established to report on the feasibility and means for the verified reduction and eventual elimination of nuclear weapons stockpiles.

Strategic delivery vehicles would he reduced:

   Strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles of specified categories and weapons designed to counter such vehicles would be reduced to agreed levels by equitable and balanced steps; their production would be discontinued or limited; their testing would be limited or halted.  

Arms and armed forces would be reduced:

   The armed forces of the United States and the Soviet Union would be limited to 2.1 million men each (with appropriate levels not exceeding that amount for other militarily significant states); levels of armaments would be correspondingly reduced and their production would be limited.
   An Experts Commission would be established to examine and report on the feasibility and means of accomplishing verifiable reduction and eventual elimination of all chemical, biological and radiological weapons.

Peaceful use of outer space would be promoted:

   The placing in orbit or stationing in outer space of weapons capable of producing mass destruction would be prohibited.
   States would give advance notification of space vehicle and missile launchings.

U.N. peace-keeping powers would be strengthened:

   Measures would be taken to develop and strengthen United Nations arrangements for arbitration, for the development of international law, and for the establishment in Stage II of a permanent U.N. Peace Force.

An International Disarmament Organization would be established for effective verification of the disarmament program:

   Its functions would be expanded progressively as disarmament proceeds.


   It would certify to all states that agreed reductions have taken place and that retained forces and armaments do not exceed permitted levels.
   It would determine the transition from one stage to the next.

States would he committed to other measures to reduce international tension and to protect against the chance of war by accident, miscalculation, or surprise attack:

   States would be committed to refrain from the threat or use of any type of armed force contrary to the principles of the U.N. Charter and to refrain from indirect aggression and subversion against any country.
   A U.N. peace observation group would be available to investigate any situation which might constitute a threat to or breach of the peace.
   States would be committed to give advance notice of major military movements which might cause alarm; observation posts would be established to report on concentrations and movements of military forces.

SECOND STAGE

   The second stage contains a series of measures which would bring within sight a world in which there would be freedom from war. Implementation of all measures in the second stage would mean:

Further substantial reductions in the armed forces, armaments, and military establishments of states, including strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and countering weapons;

Further development of methods for the peaceful settlement of disputes under the United Nations;

Establishment of a permanent international peace force within the United Nations;

Depending on the findings of an Experts Commission, a halt in the production of chemical, bacteriological, and radiological weapons and a reduction of existing stocks or their conversion to peaceful uses;

On the basis of the findings of an Experts Commission, a reduction of stocks of nuclear weapons;

The dismantling or the conversion to peaceful uses of certain military bases and facilities wherever located; and

The strengthening and enlargement of the International Disarmament Organization to enable it to verify the steps taken in Stage II and to determine the transition to Stage III.

THIRD STAGE

   During the third stage of the program, the states of the world, building on the experience and confidence gained in successfully implementing the measures of the first two stages, would take final steps toward the goal of a world in which:

States would retain only those forces, non-nuclear armaments, and establishments required for the purpose of maintaining internal order; they would also support and provide agreed manpower for a U.N. Peace Force.

The U.N. Peace Force, equipped with agreed types and quantities of armaments, would be fully functioning.

The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace Force and those required to maintain internal order. All other armaments would be destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes.

The peace-keeping capabilities of the United Nations would be sufficiently strong and the obligations of all states under such arrangements sufficiently far reaching as to assure peace and tile just settlement of differences in a disarmed world.


Appendix

DECLARATION ON DISARMAMENT

THE UNITED STATES PROGRAM FOR
GENERAL AND COMPLETE
DISARMAMENT
IN A PEACEFUL WORLD

 

The Nations of the world,
   Conscious of the crisis in human history produced by the revolutionary development of modern weapons within a world divided by serious ideological differences;
   Determined to save present and succeeding generations from the scourge of war and the dangers and burdens of the arms race and to create conditions in which all peoples can strive freely and peacefully to fulfill their basic aspirations;
   Declare their goal to be: A free, secure, and peaceful world of independent states adhering to common standards of justice and international conduct and subjecting the use of force to the rule of law; a world where adjustment to change takes place in accordance with the principles of the United Nations; a world where there shall be a permanent state of general and complete disarmament under effective international control and where the resources of nations shall be devoted to man's material, cultural, and spiritual advance;
   Set forth as the objectives of a program of general and complete disarmament in a peaceful world:
   (a) The disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of their reestablishment in any form whatsoever other than those required to preserve internal order and for contributions to a United Nations Peace Force;
   (b) The elimination from national arsenals of all armaments, including all weapons of mass destruction and the means for their delivery, other than those required for a United Nations Peace Force and for maintaining internal order;
   (c) The establishment and effective operation of an International Disarmament Organization within the framework of the United Nations to ensure compliance at all times with all disarmament obligations;
   (d) The institution of effective means for the enforcement of international agreements, for the settlement of disputes, and for the maintenance of peace in accordance with the principles of the United Nations.
   Call on the negotiating states:
   (a) To develop the outline program set forth below into an agreed plan for general and complete disarmament and to continue their efforts without interruption until the whole program has been achieved;
   (b) To this end to seek to attain the widest possible area of agreement at the earliest possible date;
   (c) Also to seek -- without prejudice to progress on the disarmament program -- agreement on those immediate measures that would contribute to the common security of nations and that could facilitate and form a part of that program.
   Affirm that disarmament negotiations should be guided by the following principles:
   (a) Disarmament shall take place as rapidly as possible until it is completed in stages containing balanced, phased and safeguarded measures, with each measure and stage to be carried out in an agreed period of time.
   (b) Compliance with all disarmament obligations shall be effectively verified from their entry into force. Verification arrangements shall be instituted progressively and in such a manner as to verify not only that agreed limitations or reductions take place but also that retained armed forces and armaments do not exceed agreed levels at any stage.
   (c) Disarmament shall take place in a manner that will not
affect adversely the security of any state, whether or not a party to an international agreement or treaty.
   (d) As states relinquish their arms, the United Nations shall he progressively strengthened in order to improve its capacity to assure international security and the peaceful settlement of differences as well as to facilitate the development of international cooperation in common tasks for the benefit of mankind.
   (e) Transition from one stage of disarmament to the next shall take place as soon as all the measures in the preceding stage have been carried out and effective verification is continuing and as soon as the arrangements that have been agreed to be necessary for the next stage have been instituted.
   Agree upon the following outline program for achieving general and complete disarmament:

STAGE I


A. To Establish an International Disarmament Organization:


   (a) An International Disarmament Organization (IDO) shall he established within the framework of the United Nations upon entry into force of the agreement. Its functions shall be expanded progressively as required for the effective verification of the disarmament program.
   (b) The IDO shall have: (1) a General Conference of all the parties; (2) a Commission consisting of representatives of all the major powers as permanent members and certain other states on a rotating basis; and (3) an Administrator who will administer the Organization subject to the direction of the Commission and who will have the authority, staff, and finances adequate to assure effective impartial implementation of the functions of the Organization.
   (c) The IDO shall: (1) ensure compliance with the obligations undertaken by verifying the execution of measures agreed upon; (2) assist the states in developing the details of agreed further verification and disarmament measures; (3) provide for the establishment of such bodies as may be necessary for working out the details of further measures provided for in the program and for such other expert study groups as may be required to give continuous study to the problems of disarmament; (4) receive reports on the progress of disarmament and verification arrangements and determine the transition from one stage to the next.

B. To Reduce Armed Forces and Armaments:


   (a) Force levels shall be limited to 2.1 million each for the U.S. and U.S.S.R. and to appropriate levels not exceeding 2.1 million each for all other militarily significant states. Reductions to the agreed levels will proceed by equitable, proportionate, and verified steps.
   (b) Levels of armaments of prescribed types shall be reduced by equitable and balanced steps. The reductions shall be accomplished by transfers of armaments to depots supervised by the IDO. When, at specified periods during the Stage I reduction process, the states party to the agreement have agreed that the armaments and armed forces are at prescribed levels, the armaments in depots shall be destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.
   (c) The production of agreed types of armaments shall be limited.
   (d) a Chemical, Biological, Radiological (CBR) Experts Commission shall be established within the IDO for the purpose of examining and reporting on the feasibility and means for accomplishing the verifiable reduction and eventual elimination of CBR weapons stockpiles and the halting of their production.

C. To Contain and Reduce the Nuclear Threat:


   (a) States that have not acceded to a treaty effectively prohibiting the testing of nuclear weapons shall do so.
   (b) The production of fissionable materials for use in weapons shall be stopped.
   (c) Upon the cessation of production of fissionable materials for use in weapons, agreed initial quantities of fissionable materials from past production shall be transferred to non-weapons purposes.
   (d) Any fissionable materials transferred between countries for peaceful uses of nuclear energy shall be subject to appropriate safeguards to be developed in agreement with the IAEA.
   (e) States owning nuclear weapons shall not relinquish control of such weapons to any nation not owning them and shall not transmit to any such nation information or material necessary for their manufacture. States not owning nuclear weapons shall not manufacture such weapons, attempt to obtain control of such weapons belonging to other states, or seek or receive information or materials necessary for their manufacture.
   (f) A Nuclear Experts Commission consisting of representatives of the nuclear states shall be established within the IDO for the purpose of examining and reporting on the feasibility and means for accomplishing the verified reduction and eventual elimination of nuclear weapons stockpiles.

D. To Reduce Strategic Nuclear Weapons Delivery Vehicles:


   (a) Strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles in specified categories and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be reduced to agreed levels by equitable and balanced steps. The reduction shall be accomplished in each step by transfers to depots supervised by the IDO of vehicles that are in excess of levels agreed upon for each step. At specified periods during the Stage I reduction process, the vehicles that have been placed under supervision of the IDO shall be destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.
   (b) Production of agreed categories of strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be discontinued or limited.
   (c) Testing of agreed categories of strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be limited or halted.

E. To Promote the Peaceful Use Of Outer Space:


   (a) The placing into orbit or stationing in outer space of weapons capable of producing mass destruction shall be prohibited.
   (b) States shall give advance notification to participating states and to the IDO of launchings of space vehicles and missiles, together with the track of the vehicle.

F. To Reduce the Risks of War by Accident, Miscalculation, and Surprise Attack:


   (a) States shall give advance notification to the participating states and to the IDO of major military movements and maneuvers, on a scale as may be agreed, which might give rise to misinterpretation or cause alarm and induce countermeasures. The notification shall include the geographic areas to be used and the nature, scale and time span of the event.
   (b) There shall be established observation posts at such locations as major ports, railway centers, motor highways, and air bases to report on concentrations and movements of military forces.
   (c) There shall also be established such additional inspection arrangements to reduce the danger of surprise attack as may be agreed.
   (d) An international commission shall be established immediately within the IDO to examine and make recommendations on the possibility of further measures to reduce the risks of nuclear war by accident, miscalculation, or failure of communication.

G. To Keep the Peace:


   (a)States shall reaffirm their obligations under the U.N. Charter to refrain from the threat or use of any type of armed force-including nuclear, conventional, or CBR--contrary to the principles of the U.N. Charter.
   (b) States shall agree to refrain from indirect aggression and subversion against any country.
   (c) States shall use all appropriate processes for the peaceful settlement of disputes and shall seek within the United Nations further arrangements for the peaceful settlement of international disputes and for the codification and progressive development of international law.
   (d) States shall develop arrangements in Stage I for the establishment in Stage II of a U.N. Peace Force.
   (e) A U.N. peace observation group shall be staffed with a standing cadre of observers who could be dispatched to investigate any situation which might constitute a threat to or breach of the peace.

STAGE II


A. International Disarmament Organization:


   The powers and responsibilities of the IDO shall be progressively enlarged in order to give it the capabilities to verify the measures undertaken in Stage II.

B. To Further Reduce Armed Forces and Armaments:


   (a) Levels of forces for the U.S., U.S.S.R., and other militarily significant states shall be further reduced by substantial amounts to agreed levels in equitable and balanced steps.
   (b) Levels of armaments of prescribed types shall be further reduced by equitable and balanced steps. The reduction shall be accomplished by transfers of armaments to depots supervised by the IDO. When, at specified periods during the Stage II reduction process, the parties have agreed that the armaments and armed forces are at prescribed levels, the armaments in depots shall be destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.
   (c) There shall he further agreed restrictions on the production of armaments.
   (d) Agreed military bases and facilities wherever they are located shall he dismantled or converted to peaceful uses.
   (e) Depending upon the findings of the Experts Commission on CBR weapons, the production of CBR weapons shall be halted, existing stocks progressively reduced, and the resulting excess quantities destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.

C. To Further Reduce the Nuclear Threat:


   Stocks of nuclear weapons shall be progressively reduced to the minimum levels which can be agreed upon as a result of the findings of the Nuclear Experts Commission; the resulting excess of fissionable material shall be transferred to peaceful purposes.

D. To Further Reduce Strategic Nuclear Weapons Delivery Vehicles:


   Further reductions in the stocks of strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be carried out in accordance with the procedure outlined in Stage I.

E. To Keep the Peace:


   During Stage II, states shall develop further the peace-keeping processes of the United Nations1 to the end that the United Nations can effectively in Stage III deter or suppress any threat or use of force in violation of the purposes and principles of the United Nations:
   (a) States shall agree upon strengthening the structure, authority, and operation of the United Nations so as to assure that the United Nations will be able effectively to protect states against threats to or breaches of the peace.
   (b) The U.N. Peace Force shall be established and progressively strengthened.
   (c) States shall also agree upon further improvements and developments in rules of international conduct and in processes for peaceful settlement of disputes and differences.

STAGE III

    By the time Stage II has been completed, the confidence produced through a verified disarmament program, the acceptance of rules of peaceful international behavior, and the development of strengthened international peace-keeping processes within the framework of the U.N. should have reached a point where the states of the world can move forward to Stage III. In Stage III progressive controlled disarmament and continuously developing principles and procedures of international law would proceed to a point where no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force and all international disputes would be settled according to the agreed principles of international conduct.
   The progressive steps to be taken during the final phase of the disarmament program would be directed toward the attainment of a world in which:
   (a) States would retain only those forces, non-nuclear armaments, and establishments required for the purpose of maintaining internal order; they would also support and provide agreed manpower for a U.N Peace Force.
   (b) The U.N. Peace Force, equipped with agreed types and quantities of armaments, would be fully functioning.
   (c) The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace Force and those required to maintain internal order. All other armaments would be destroyed or converted to peaceful
purposes.
   (d) The peace-keeping capabilities of the United Nations would be sufficiently strong and the obligations of all states under such arrangements sufficiently far-reaching as to assure peace and the just settlement of differences in a disarmed world.  

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1961 O---609147  

_________________________

 

A New Form of Unilateral Disarmament

Editorial by Jon Christian Ryter
6/14/99

Clinton Empties United States Arsenal As He Prepares the Nation For its Admission Into the New World Order

In 1962 President John Fitzgerald Kennedy issued an Executive Order that started the wheels of world disarmament turning. From that Kennedy-era directive the State Department produced a doctrinal statement known today as State Department Publication #7277. SDP #7277 detailed the plan under which the United States would initiate the first phase of world disarmament not through a joint agreement with the Soviet Union, but by unilaterally disarming itself. (Ultimately, SDP #7277 calls for the disarming of the population of the United States as it poses the argument that a population that is protected by its government has no practical need for firearms. In reality, since the object of SDP #7277 is preparing the world for global governance, the total disarming of its citizens, who will likely resist the loss of sovereignty, is imperative.)

It was believed by the Council on Foreign Relations members within the Kennedy Administration (the same ones, by the way, whose advise caused the collapse of the Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba--and they were the same ones who told Kennedy that the Soviets were not installing missiles in Cuba a year later) that global disarmament could be achieved only if the United States took the first step and dismantled its nuclear arsenal as a show of good faith to the Soviets...who they imagined would then happily dismantle their own arsenal of nuclear weapons and plant daisies in their missile silos.

The globalists were well on their way to Utopia through the balance of the Kennedy years, the Johnson years, the Nixon years and into the Carter years. But, even as Carter was downsizing the American military, he also authorized the top secret Stealth technology spending bill that led to the Stealth bombers and the laser-guided missiles that won the Gulf War and brought about the final collapse of the Soviet Union.

Ronald Wilson Reagan, the 40th President of the United States, who recognized that the United States could not negotiate with the Soviet Union from a position of weakness, reversed the trends of the previous four presidents and began to rebuild the military of the United States. Part of his plan was to create a laser shield over the United States, an umbrella of protection called the Strategic Defense Initiative. It was during this final arms race that the economically bankrupt Soviet Union collapsed under its own Marxist weight. (It had actually been bankrupt for several years, but in a controlled society, only the bankers knew how bad things were, since the losses from loan defaults were absorbed by the International Monetary Fund, which means they were ultimately paid by the taxpayers of the United States.)

After 8 years of Reagan, the United States was militarily the strongest nation of the world. Of course, that would not be acknowledged by our friends and enemies until the Gulf War. For a brief moment in time George Herbert Walker Bush was the most popular president in the history of the United States. But, it would be a short-lived popularity. Because Bush could not deliver the globalists North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) to the utopians, which would begin the slow and tedious task of transferring the jobs of America to the economically deprived nations in Central and South America, he had to go. A Democrat was needed in the White House to get the Democratically-controlled Congress to pass it. And, more important, what was needed was a man with no moral character, ethics or integrity to stand in the way of the sell-out of America.

No one fit the bill better than Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton.

William Jefferson Clinton inherited the most powerful nation in the history of the world. Even before the liberal applause at his inauguration had died, Clinton had already set about to dismantle that legacy. Clinton was aided in this crime by a myriad of socialist liberals, both Republican and Democrat, that joined his utopian dream of one world government.

Unknown to most Americans was Clinton's June, 1991 visit to Baden-Baden, Germany (at the invitation of his close friend and advisor Vernon Jordan) to meet the wealthy elites of Europe at the annual Bilderberger conference. It is reported that at this conference (where invitations come only from Crown Prince Bernhardt of the Netherlands) that Clinton pleaded his case to become the 42nd President of the United States. That price, we are now certain, was the promised surrender of the sovereignty of the United States of America to the New World Order.

We know this because of the material found in Box #1748 at the National Archive in which the working papers of the Hillary Clinton Health Security Act of 1994 were found. Buried in Hillary's healthcare plan was a lot more than healthcare.

Within those documents were the rudiments of an electronic monitoring system through which access to the roadways of the nation--and intrastate travel--could be controlled. Also buried in the working papers was an internal passport that contained a personal identifier and a computer chip upon which a database on the card holder could be stored. Also in that chip was a tracking chip that would allow Big Brother to monitor the whereabouts of any citizen in the United States--and the world. Both systems, the global monitor and the internal passport, according to the working papers were being initiated in every nation in the world and the report, found in what is labeled the "Diebold Report," draws comparisons between the evolution of the systems being implemented in the various nations.

Most startling is the fact that the systems that the Clintons were attempting to implement actually were funded by the Democratically-controlled Congress during the Bush years, with a massive amount of funding on exploring what is known as the Intelligent Vehicle Highway System (IV-HS) technology being provided by the Bush Administration.

That effort, spit and polished by the media until it would appear like a technology that will do nothing more harmful than save lives and eliminate highway congestion, is actually an elaborate GPS system through which the movement of the general population can be monitored, and if need be, controlled by denying access to certain roadways or intrastate travel.

It is important, at this point, for America to remember that last year it was discovered by Congressmen Ron Paul and Bob Barr that the Internal Passport, that was introduced as a national ID card in the Immigration Reform Act of 1996, and had passed in the United States Senate, was stopped in the House. Yet, somehow, when the two versions of the Immigration Reform Act went into joint conference, the national ID card was not stripped from the joint bill as required by federal law since it was never passed in the House. A month later, the national ID card was surreptitiously inserted in the House version of the Omnibus Budget Bill (but not the Senate version), and was signed into law by Clinton. The following spring, the personal identifier which will track every American from birth to death, was inserted into the "take your insurance with you" reform healthcare bill.

The Clinton Administration then extracted the various pieces from the various bills, two of which were illegally passed, and assigned the task to implementing a national drivers license (a clone of the European Union national ID card) to the National Transportation Safety Board. The internal passport will go into effect on October 1, 1999.

Clinton, when he arrived in Washington, was charged with task of surrendering America's arsenal to the United Nations. The only priority the Clintons seemed to have with respect to the armed forces was how to achieve "sexual balance" as it introduced gender quotas on the military. Money earmarked for defense spending was used to add female lavatories in formerly all male barracks. Morale in the military nose-dived and resignations and early retirements of some of the best military people in the world escalated. Clinton, again, was pleased. Downsizing was occurring of its own volition. Today, the military is so understaffed that Clinton's own military advisors have told him that America could not fight two regional conflicts today at the same time without using the same personnel and machines in both conflicts.

In 1995 Clinton issued his famous Presidential Decision Directive #25 which, according to the brief synopsis of PDD25 that he sent to Congress, would turn control of the United States military over to the United Nations "under some circumstances." What those circumstances were never explained.

Former Congressman Bob B-1 Dornan, the Chairman of the House Armed Service Committee, attempted to get a copy of PDD25 but was denied access to it by Clinton. It was even too top secret for Dornan, who carried the highest security clearance in the nation, to see. It was Dornan's fight with Clinton over PDD25 that led to the illegal vote gathering and illegal activity of enrolling legal aliens (but not citizens) in Dornan's California district in order to vote Dornan out of office.

Clinton's zeal to dismantle the military strength of the United States was reasonably held in check by the GOP Congress for almost five years--until the Balkan crisis gave him the opportunity to dismantle America's instruments of war in a new and enterprising way...by exploding them.

As the 79 day war in the Balkans began, the United States began expending its missile and bomb inventory at such an alarming rate that several Congressmen and Senators voiced their concerns that, at the rate Clinton was using up the military inventory, by the end of the conflict America would be so weakened that it could be beaten by any second-rate military power in the world.

The rumors came and went, ignored by the media...and worse, by the American people.

Below is a list of the inventory of bombs and missiles expended by the United States during the Balkan 'crisis." A total of 22,000 bombs and missiles were fired and/or dropped on targets in Serbia and Kosovo. Of those, 15,800 came from the military inventory of the United States...and only 6,200 came from the inventories of the other nine European nations who participated in the "allied" attack on a sovereign nation. On the average, those nations each fired or dropped some 700 bombs and missiles each...approximately 5% of what the United States expended.

The media spinmeisters in the Clinton Administration issued a press released to the media over the weekend in which it said that the "war" in the Balkans cost between $2 billion and $3 billion. That is something of an understatement since the guidance system that is used in those bombs and missiles that were laser guided (all but 8,860 of those used) cost the taxpayers of the United States $151,880,000.00 by themselves--without adding the cost of the bombs or missiles to which they were attached, or the delivery systems, or the manpower, or the gasoline used to fly the missions--or the cost of the use of the air planes themselves.

Interestingly, the 22,000 bombs and missiles destroyed (again, according to the Clinton Administration) 200 of Serbia's 400 artillery pieces; 100 of Serbia's 300 tanks; and 100 of Serbia's 300 armored personnel carriers. (One must question the strategic value of that exchange. 22,000 bombs and missiles to eliminate 400 pieces of military hardware.) Now, that's good shootin'!

Of the estimated 40,000 Serb soldiers and/or paramilitary police in Kosovo, NATO estimated that 10,000 were killed or wounded. The bulk of the bombs and missiles were used to destroy non-military targets such as residential homes, hospitals, power plants, manufacturing plants...and civilians attempting to escape the lethal rain.

Bill Clinton is a proud man today. He has achieved much of his objectives. What were they? First, as a "mover and shaper" of the New World Order he, Tony Blair , and the utopians behind the one-world government movement of the European Union sent a message to all of the nations of the world: there is now a power greater than any nation, and that power can, and will act against any sovereign nation that does not bend to its demands. Second, Clinton solved the problem of eliminating our weapons of war...and was painted by the liberal media as a "war hero" as he did it.

The final step of disarming America is the disarming of the American people and the abrogation of America's right to own firearms. This task is underway today. Victory is predicted this year by the Clinton Administration. When the 2nd Amendment falls, the sovereignty of the United States will fall shortly thereafter. America, weakened to the point that it cannot adequately defend itself against the global military forces of the United Nations, will be forced to capitulate and join the utopian stateless nations of the New World Order shortly after we cross Bill Clinton's toll bridge to the 21st century.

 

Return To Top